Positive Programs

Safer prisons are within reach

A report from Alabama Appleseed

Violence, understaffing, and overcrowded dorms are pushing Alabama’s prison system past a breaking point, and the state’s reliance on new prisons alone will not be enough to resolve the deep-seated problems that are resulting in record deaths and creating a less safe Alabama.

Alabama Appleseed Positive Programs

Resident Darren McKenzie (right) and Jesse Mackin water tomato plants on the grounds of the Mountain View Correctional Facility’s garden in Charleston in June 2021. Photo by Kevin Bennett for Maine Public.

This report highlights programs in other states, many led by incarcerated people themselves, that are reducing violence in prisons, reducing recidivism and creating safer working environments for prison staff.

This briefing lays out five real-world examples of prison reforms from other states. They’re not theories. These are programs already in place that are reducing violence, cutting recidivism and helping staff do their jobs more safely and effectively.

Take California’s GRIP program, where men serving long sentences learn how to manage anger and take responsibility for past harm. Graduates almost never come back to prison. In South Carolina, a pilot program for young adults has cut the use of solitary confinement and assaults on staff. And in Maine, an “earned living unit” features higher education opportunities, a garden, and increased time outdoors. Missouri, Maine and Oregon are trying models that focus on rehabilitation and basic human dignity—with results that speak for themselves.

Alabama Appleseed Positive Programs Report

Residents Julio Orsini (left) and Jesse Mackin share a meal together with staff during lunch break in the garden at the Mountain View Correctional Facility in Charleston in Aug. 2021. Photos by Bennett for Maine Public.

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

  • 98.8%

    The percentage of the 1,765 graduates of California’s Guiding Rage into Power (GRIP) program who haven’t reoffended.

  • $600 million annually

    Taxpayer money saved due to a reduction in recidivism for those in the GRIP program. 

  • 73%

    The percentage decrease in the odds of a violent charge while in prison for participants in South Carolina’s Restoring Promise, a peer-led program. 

  • 83%

    The reduction of incarcerated people in the Restoring Promise program staying in solitary confinement.  

  • 73.9%

    The reduction of assaults for participants in Oregon’s Amend program.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Lawmakers, ADOC officials and other stakeholders should reach out to the state leaders outside Alabama involved in implementation of these programs and develop a greater understanding of how these reforms occurred and how Alabama can replicate them. People love opportunities to share their success stories.
  2. ADOC should recognize that some of the most effective programs in other states are led by incarcerated individuals. With perennial staff shortages at ADOC, the climate is ideal to create more opportunities for leadership and program development by the people most impacted by prison conditions, the people housed there. Incarcerated leaders should be given additional opportunities to lead within the prison walls.
  3. ADOC should increase its collaborations with universities and other programming partners. Already, Auburn University, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Troy University, University of North Alabama and others have partnered successfully inside state prisons to deliver a variety of excellent educational and vocational programming. With larger prisons that include additional education space, these universities could do even more with additional access and coordination.